<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>the gui girl &#187; web standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theguigirl.com/guigirlblog/category/web-standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theguigirl.com/guigirlblog</link>
	<description>(excuse the dust, we're renovating)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:57:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>On Web Accessibility, Adobe Beta Versions and a Buzzword Update</title>
		<link>http://www.theguigirl.com/guigirlblog/2008/06/02/on-web-accessibility-adobe-beta-versions-and-a-buzzword-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theguigirl.com/guigirlblog/2008/06/02/on-web-accessibility-adobe-beta-versions-and-a-buzzword-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>denise</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[UI/IA/IxD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not baby!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theguigirl.com/guigirlblog/2008/06/02/on-web-accessibility-adobe-beta-versions-and-a-buzzword-update/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First things first:  Resource Interactive (yeah, I&#8217;m looking at YOU, Resource!) posted a new technology blog.  First real topic post (as opposed to &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>First things first: </strong> <a href="http://www.resourceinteractive.com">Resource Interactive</a> (yeah, I&#8217;m looking at YOU, Resource!) posted a <a href="http://ritechnology.typepad.com/technology/">new technology blog</a>.  First real topic post (as opposed to the welcome post) is about <a href="http://ritechnology.typepad.com/technology/2008/05/testing-for-web.html">web accessibility</a> &#8212; in my experience as a consultant on past development teams, a much feared, possibly misunderstood (and somewhat maligned) concept by developers, project managers, and business analysts alike.</p>
<p>Once I actually heard &#8220;Why do we care so much about BLIND people, anyway?&#8221; uttered by a STATE employee over the course of one of my projects.  Evidently it was not apparent that they worked with a blind person, and several vision-impaired individuals <em><strong>in their own department</strong></em>.  I assure you, they weren&#8217;t trying to be a jerk, but they genuinely did not understand why my team put so much effort in designing, testing, and retesting each of our interfaces.</p>
<p>The <abbr title="Resource Interactive">RI</abbr> article itself is pretty good, a decent overview of what developers and designers face when building a site these days, a short survey of possible impairments or barriers, as well as a few clever browser-oriented evaluation resources.  However, there are some resources not cited in the post that I feel have incredible value &#8212; both as a method for automated testing, but even more so as a resource to truly understanding the experience of those with disabilities as they use internet technologies.  I&#8217;ll be working on a complementary article this week addressing some of the other meaty aspects of accessibilty evaluation (it&#8217;s not just a government-mandated checklist anymore!) as well as providing a context for why accessible practices are so important in web development.<br />
<strong>Next:  Adobe Beta Versions:</strong>  Anyone want to try out some beta-version Adobe Software?</p>
<ul>
<li>Dreamweaver Beta &#8211;> <a href="http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/dreamweavercs4/">http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/dreamweavercs4/</a></li>
<li>Fireworks Beta &#8211;> <a href="http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/fireworkscs4/"> http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/fireworkscs4/</a></li>
<li>Soundbooth &#8211;> <a href="http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/soundboothcs4/"> http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/soundboothcs4/</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Also: Buzzword Update:</strong>  I&#8217;m pretty stoked about this one, because I&#8217;ve been using Buzzword for a while, and it would appear that our voices have been heard to export Buzzword docs as PDFs.  Seems like a no-brainer as Buzzword has not been branded as an Adobe Acrobat product officially as of this weekend.  To my clients and cohorts &#8212; yup, it means you&#8217;ll have to update your logins to an Adobe Id.  Sorry about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theguigirl.com/guigirlblog/2008/06/02/on-web-accessibility-adobe-beta-versions-and-a-buzzword-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HTML and CSS and STUFF</title>
		<link>http://www.theguigirl.com/guigirlblog/2008/03/14/html-and-css-and-stuff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theguigirl.com/guigirlblog/2008/03/14/html-and-css-and-stuff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>denise</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[not baby!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theguigirl.com/guigirlblog/2008/03/14/html-and-css-and-stuff/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just in case anyone out there needs to brush up on standards-focused best practices for HTML and CSS.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in case anyone out there needs to brush up on <a href="http://www.htmldog.com/">standards-focused best practices for HTML and CSS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theguigirl.com/guigirlblog/2008/03/14/html-and-css-and-stuff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Radio Buttons Don&#8217;t Actually Work Like This</title>
		<link>http://www.theguigirl.com/guigirlblog/2008/02/20/radio-buttons-dont-actually-work-like-this/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theguigirl.com/guigirlblog/2008/02/20/radio-buttons-dont-actually-work-like-this/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>denise</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[UI/IA/IxD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humour is funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not baby!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theguigirl.com/guigirlblog/2008/02/20/radio-buttons-dont-actually-work-like-this/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The most clever abuse of radio buttons ever performed by a dinosaur.
This is for my UI homies, all 2 of them.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.qwantz.com/archive/001169.html">The most clever abuse of radio buttons ever performed by a dinosaur</a>.</p>
<p>This is for my UI homies, all 2 of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theguigirl.com/guigirlblog/2008/02/20/radio-buttons-dont-actually-work-like-this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>rage against the WCAG machine</title>
		<link>http://www.theguigirl.com/guigirlblog/2006/05/24/rage-against-the-wcag-machine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theguigirl.com/guigirlblog/2006/05/24/rage-against-the-wcag-machine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 03:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>denise</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theguigirl.com/guigirlblog/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Journalist, author, and accessibility consultant Joe Clark pens a delicious smackdown citing the peceived shortcomings of the proposed WCAG 2.0 draft process published on a &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Journalist, author, and accessibility consultant <a href="http://joeclark.org/access/?ALA">Joe Clark</a> pens a delicious smackdown citing the peceived shortcomings of the proposed <acronym title="Web Content Accessibility Guidelines">WCAG</acronym> 2.0 draft <em>process</em> published on <a href="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/tohellwithwcag2">a list apart</a>.   A fantastic and important read for anyone trying to adhere to web development standards &#8212; and especially important for people who engineer accessible sites.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s long, and there&#8217;s a <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/">lot to absorb</a>.  And very little time is left to post your comments to the Web Accessibility Initiative (<a href="http://www.w3.org/WAI/">WAI</a>) committee as it is last call for acceptance of WCAG 2.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theguigirl.com/guigirlblog/2006/05/24/rage-against-the-wcag-machine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
